Betweeted Brings Ads to Twitter Without Spamming

By Jimmy Rogers (@me)
Contributing Writer, [GAS]

twitterTwitter has been a monetization puzzle for many because it possesses enormous popularity and “mindshare” among the internet savvy, but does not present any straightforward way to make money.  Attempts have been made to market through tweets or through the background wallpapers, but neither of these have been very successful thus far.  The former is often seen as spam and the latter is largely overlooked by passing users.

magpieBeamagpie, an automated twitter ad service, seemed to have the right idea because it allowed users to control how often ads were tweeted into their feeds and what kinds of ads were approved.  Unfortunately the major failing of Beamagpie was the formatting of their ads.  When you read one of their ad, it didn’t sound anything like anything a normal user would tweet.  Instead it sounded a lot like an unsolicited email you might receive in your email inbox (aka, SPAM).

The controversy became personal when I was playing with Beamagpie and another service called Twtad (which I don’t recommend) and got complaints from some of my followers.  It seems there are many on Twitter who don’t appreciate the introduction of ads to their “virgin country.”  To some extent I agree with this sentiment, but if Twitter is to survive and thrive it must also grow and change.  A revenue model, whether it is implemented by Twitter or its users, is an almost certain part of its future.

betweeted

The same week that I decided to stop using Beamagpie, I discovered Betweeted.  Inspired by Beamagpie, it has a similar interface, but the ad structure and syntax is different.  When real users want to advertise something, they use a retweet.  If you’re not familiar, a retweet is usually in this format: RT @user “previous message – link”.  Essentially you’re sending a carbon copy of someone else’s message to all your followers.

Betweeted requires all of its advertisers to have an active Twitter account along with a website so that instead of traditional “ads,” Betweeted users can simply retweet.  Best of all, the more interesting or well worded a retweet is, the more likely that other Twitter users will pass along the same link, producing even more paying clicks.

Like many Twitter ad sites, the interface is divided between twitterers and advertisers.  This allows the two parties to work independently of one another.  On the twitterer side (the only side I’ve used), advertisers are listed along with their pay/click value.  Clicking through displays the maximum number of dollars that can be earned from each link (usually in the twenties, but often higher) as well as the link’s destination and information about the advertiser.

The interface is very new and still being developed so I don’t want to commit this article to too many details, but thus far I have been impressed with the transparency presented by Betweeted.  @betweeted_com is the company’s Twitter account and I have gotten a great deal of support from them that way.

Just to be clear, Geeks Are Sexy does not endorse Betweeted and we will not be using it on our twitter feed. It’s just an interesting service and we figured we’d share it with you.

What do you think of ads on Twitter? I’m making a little bet with myself about what kinds of comments we’ll get on this article.  Twitter ads are a contentious topic, to say the least, so feel free to share your thoughts, but do try to be courteous a the same time! Also @me on Twitter if you want a one-on-one dialogue.

RSS is Dead; Long Live RSS!

By Sterling “Chip” Camden
Contributing Writer, [GAS]

Steve Gillmor says that RSS is dead.   As a member of the RSS Advisory Board, I feel compelled to inform Mr. Gillmor that his pronouncement is a bit premature.

Gillmor’s point seems to be that people no longer directly consume RSS feeds through their feed readers – that they spend all their time on Twitter and other social sites, engaged in a real-time conversation instead.  They get their news in the form of shortened URLs that others have Tweeted, rather than following all the posts from specific blogs.

That may be a trend, but it’s far from the whole story.  Even though Twitter’s popularity is skyrocketing with between 1 and 2 million tweets per day as of this writing and possibly reaching 12 million users by the end of the year, that still represents a small fraction of the overall Internet population (which now stands at over 1.5 billion).

How do all those other people consume their news?  Well, besides the Luddites who still rely on email chain letters, a large number of Internet users subscribe to feeds.  TechCrunch, the parent site of TechCrunchIT on which Gillmor posted his rant, reportedly passed the 2 million subscriber mark earlier this year.  I don’t think Michael Arrington would consider all those subscribers superfluous, nor would he second Gillmor’s advice that they unsubscribe and rely on Twitter to tell them when anything interesting is posted in the future.

Even people who don’t use feeds directly often benefit from them without knowing it.  Aggregators like FriendFeed use RSS or ATOM as a transport mechanism to gather the feeds they present to their users.  I’ve often thought that users have to go through too many steps to subscribe to most feeds, and these aggregators represent just one way to simplify that.  I’ve always expected that over time users will lose their awareness of RSS as it becomes ubiquitous.  They won’t need to connect the wires in order to use the telephone any more.

Gillmor also makes much about the revolution that full text feeds brought to news consumers.  I agree – I like to stay in my feed reader rather than clicking through from summaries or titles to read the full article.  But Twitter reverses that – often you don’t get a summary, or even a recognizable URL to give you a clue to the content for which you’re invited to click.  Is that progress?

How about you?  Do you still read feeds?  Has Twitter or some other social site changed the way you consume information online?

[Crown picture source: Flickr (CC)]



Beatles For Sale

Rock Band players who want the full experience for the next installment of the game had better get saving now. If you want John, Paul, George and Ringo, you’ll need Benjamin, Benjamin, Benjamin and Benjamin – and Ulysses Grant in the Yoko role.

The game by itself will cost $59, but it’s now been revealed that the $249 special edition with customized instruments will include replicas of Paul McCartney’s Hofner bass and Ringo Starr’s Ludwig drum set, plus a generic microphone. (The game will allow up to three microphones to be used for harmonies.)

Guitars based on John Lennon’s Rickenbacker 325  and George Harrison’s Gretsch Duo Jet will only be available to purchase individually at $99 each. (TG Daily notes that the real things would cost you around $2,500 to $3,000 each.) They’ll also be compatible with all other games in the Rock Band series.

The game is due for release on 9 September and will also serve as part of a marketing blitz for a series of remastered CD releases of Beatles Albums. It will follow the basic concept of other Rock Bands, but is being billed as a completely standalone game with “gameplay that takes players on a journey through the legacy and evolution of the band’s legendary career.” The project has included involvement from Giles Martin, the man behind the remixed music of the Love album and stageshow.

Oxygen: A 3D Animated Short

Produced by Christopher Hendryx as his thesis for the department of Computer Animation at the Ringling College of Art + Design, Oxygen is a really cool 3D animated short featuring Oxygen as our main hero, with various other elements thrown in as supporting characters.

Now, if all chemistry classes where this interesting, I guess it wouldn’t be very hard to get kids interested in the subject anymore.

Star Trek Fans Outraged New Film is Exciting, Enjoyable

In the following video, The Onion News Network reports that long time Star Trek fans feel the new movie betrays what Star Trek is all about. For instance, it seems that some trekkies are outraged at the fact that Klingon dialogues in the movie are subtitled, because it allows the Klingons to be understood by people who haven’t studied the imaginary language for years.

Oh, and if this is the first time you’ve listened to a news report from the Onion News Network, please note that ANYTHING that comes from them shouldn’t be taken too seriously.

Are ATM Machines Safe to Use?

ATMs are everywhere today and provide crooks with a relatively easy way to rob you blind. In the following video, the crew from The Real Hustle demonstrates how easy it is for a thief to get his hands on your ATM card information and PIN number.

So now that you’ve seen this, do you still think that ATM machines are safe to use? Being in the place of the young woman in the video, would you have noticed that the machine she was using had been tampered with?

[Via TechEblog]

Rocket Launch Tonight – Look Out Eastern US!

By Jimmy Rogers (@me)
Contributing Writer, [GAS]

Seems that this week’s science stories are all going to the physicists.  Between 8:00PM and 11:00PM (EST) TONIGHT, a “Minotaur I” rocket should be visible to the entire Eastern seaboard of the United States.  It is being launched from NASA’s Wallops Island Flight Facility in Virginia (the state where I happen to be located!).

The firey exhaust is visible for 800 miles from its launch site so pray for clear skies tonight!

Want a preview?  This video of a boy and his father watching a similar launch in California is not only spectacular, but their commentary will warm your heart (or at least it did mine).

It’s not every day you get to see a rocket launch so take the time to watch the sky tonight.  If you do see something (or not), please post a comment on the experience so others out of range can hear about it first-hand!

[via Gizmodo]

Goats Invade Silicon Valley

By Casey Lynn
Contributing Writer, [GAS]

So Google is getting in on the whole “going green” thing by foregoing the “noisy mowers that run on gasoline and pollute the air” in favor of renting a bunch of goats to chew on the lawn at the company headquarters in Mountain View. Two hundred of them hang out for a week with a border collie, munching the Google grass (which I’m sure is delicious), before being shipped to somewhere else. Somewhere like Yahoo?

yahootwitter

Because after Google’s (perhaps slightly smug) announcement, Yahoo popped up and said, “Don’t get all high and mighty about those goats, Google, because we totally beat you to the punch.” Apparently they’ve been using goats-as-lawnmowers for years.

On a side note, does anyone else find that “Yahoo” twittering to “Google” kind of anthropomorphizes them in a slightly creepy way? However, one thing that is not slightly creepy are these goats, which are indeed much cuter than lawnmowers.

goats

frankHowever, I submit that it wasn’t search engines that herded the goats into Silicon Valley, but rather Livejournal, where Frank the Goat has been doing their yardwork since 1999.

Of course, The Washington Post wonders how much fuel it takes to ship goats around – less than the lawnmowers, one would hope? Though in any case, with Google taking up the cause, I can’t help but wonder what might be next: iGoat?