Antoine Ruault of Cinevore has created a touching tribute to the late Dame Maggie Smith, celebrating her remarkable versatility in drama, comedy, and mystery. This moving montage highlights her unforgettable portrayal of Lady Violet Crawley in Downton Abbey and captures the humility and gratitude that defined her career. As Dame Maggie once said, “I’ve had so much luck and so much good fortune that it frightens me somehow.” She passed away on September 27, 2024, at the age of 89.
For today’s edition of “Deal of the Day,” here are some of the best deals we stumbled on while browsing the web this morning! Please note that Geeks are Sexy might get a small commission from qualifying purchases done through our posts. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
–1minAI: Lifetime Subscription – Why choose between ChatGPT, Midjourney, GoogleAI, and MetaAI when you could get them all in one tool? – $234.00 $39.99
Out of 225 people awarded the Nobel Prize in physics, only five have been women. This is a very small number, and certainly smaller than 50% – the percent of women in the human population.
Three of the five Nobel Prizes in physics awarded to women have been in the past decade. As a woman physicist, seeing three women join the cadre of Nobel laureates in Physics in just a handful of years is beyond exciting.
Nobel Prize-winning work
The three woman physicists receiving Nobel Prize honors in the 21st century are Donna Strickland, who won in 2018, Andrea Ghez, who won in 2020, and Anne L’Huillier, who won in 2023. All three made important contributions to science.
Being a minority in a research field isn’t easy. Sticking with it long enough to have a storied career, as the three winners have, is a huge accomplishment. Since winning the prize, the three winners have recounted their research journeys and offered advice to the next generation of physicists in a variety of interviews. I’ve noticed a few common threads.
A career in academia is a long haul. All three women emphasize the timescale involved in going from first steps in their research to being recognized by the Nobel committee. L’Huillier refers to it as a long journey.
While winning a Nobel may come with some glamour and notoriety, if you are after a quick reward, this career may not be the right line of work. It now takes an average of 28 years between publishing a discovery and receiving a Nobel in physics.
You cannot predict which basic science topic is going to lead to a Nobel – nor, for that matter, which will end up having any kind of impact. The best an early-career physicist can do is to explore different topics, try new things, lean into discomfort and find something they’re passionate about.
All three women talk about how many times they ran into difficulties. Before she got the chirped pulse amplification method to work, Strickland had started to wonder whether she would ever get a Ph.D., having hit so many dead ends. The first time Ghez proposed the project that would lead to her celebrated work, she was turned down.
All three of them thought of quitting at some point. So don’t be discouraged if you are turned down or if others say you cannot do it.
Ghez recommends seeing experiments that don’t work not as failures but as opportunities.
Movies and TV shows paint a picture of the scientist as a social misfit, an individual working alone in the laboratory. But that’s not how it works. All these women work in teams.
“Science is a team sport. You need to know what you don’t know and seek help for what is missing,” says Strickland.
Seeking help often leads to collaborations with other research groups. As Ghez puts it, “Science is a very social enterprise.”
And above all else, the three medalists referred to luck as an essential ingredient for success. The world is full of physicists just as dedicated and just as smart who don’t get the Nobel.
Themes specific to women
Strickland, Ghez and L’Huillier are always asked about their experiences being a woman in science and their views on diversity and equity in physics. All of them emphasize the importance of diversity.
They also mention the importance of a support network, especially for women. Having a group of people you trust to cheer you on can help when you feel discouraged.
Strickland left the standard academic path after a postdoctoral fellowship to become a technician so she could be close to her husband and start her family. L’Huillier walked away from her job and moved from France to Sweden, where she was unemployed for a while. Ghez waited years to have kids. There is no single trajectory. But time away from research can give you fresh perspectives and inspiration to take the next steps.
These women have pointed out that the culture for women in science has improved over their careers and they are optimistic about the future. If you calculate the percent of Nobel Prizes in physics awarded to women in the past decade alone, then about 1 in 10 Nobel recipients have been women. To me, this indicates that, indeed, things may be getting better.
For 19 years, Geeks Are Sexy has been your one-stop shop for everything from lightsaber duels to epic cosplay photography. What started as a little passion project back in 2005 has grown into a geek haven for thousands, and as I just turned 50, I’m ready to keep this quest going—dragons, trolls, and social media algorithms be damned!
But here’s the problem: 2024 has thrown some serious battles our way. Thanks to Facebook’s ever-shifting algorithm, traffic to the site has dropped. As a one-man band running this small spot on the web (and single dad of three), it’s been difficult keeping all the gears turning without the usual XP. And did I mention I’m also battling a rare neurodegenerative condition called achalasia? Yup, it’s like my esophagus is a malfunctioning droid that won’t stop glitching—painful spasms that make me feel like I’m having a heart attack in the middle of most nights.
Even though life sometimes feels like I’m stuck in the Dark Souls of business challenges, my love for this community and our daily geek-out sessions keeps me going strong.
And here’s where you come in—my brave adventurers! This is my annual support request, and your contribution can ensure Geeks Are Sexy keeps leveling up for years to come. How can you save the day?
–Become a Patreon Supporter: Monthly contributions provide a steady mana pool to keep the site running smoothly, free from the chaos of social media.
–Donate via PayPal: Whether it’s a single health potion or a full-on revival spell, every bit helps cover the costs of keeping the server hamsters spinning.
Your support isn’t just a donation; it’s also a lifeline for a family that needs it.
Oh, and if you’re visiting from an external source, don’t forget to bookmark the site—there’s a whole universe of content beyond the social media galaxy!
Thank you for sticking with me on this epic journey. Your loyalty is like a trusty sidekick, and I couldn’t do this without you.
Meta supremo Mark Zuckerberg unveiled Orion smart glasses, a new augmented reality (AR) prototype, at the annual Meta Connect developer conference. Ten years in the making, and still not expected on high streets until 2027, these will be a new way to meld the real and digital worlds. They will be controlled by the eyes and also the fingers via a neural interface on the wrist.
So what does this mean for the future of AR wearables and how we interface with computers? We asked three tech specialists at the University of Bangor, Peter Butcher, Llŷr ap Cenydd and Panagiotis Ritsos.
Why has Orion been such a technical challenge?
There are serious technical challenges in packing so much sophisticated technology into something so compact. This includes new holographic display technology, hand and eye tracking, off-device processing, cameras, speakers and microphones – all while ensuring the device remains aesthetically appealing and has decent battery life.
Meta’s chief tech officer, Andrew Bosworth, recently captured the scale of the challenge by saying: “In consumer electronics, it might be the most advanced thing that we’ve ever produced as a species.”
br>
The optical design is a huge challenge. Mixed reality headsets such as Meta Quest 3 and Apple Vision Pro rely on “passthrough” technology, in which external cameras capture real-time video of the user’s surroundings. This is displayed inside the headset, with digital elements overlaid.
In contrast, Orion’s holographic projection allows users to directly see through transparent lenses, with graphics projected into their view. This has demanded substantial R&D.
Are there other notable innovations?
One key factor that determines the immersiveness of mixed reality headsets is their field of view, meaning the angular range that the viewer can see through the headset. The state of the art is the 70° field of view of the Magic Leap 2, bigger holographic AR glasses aimed at businesses currently priced above US$3,000 (£2,240)]. They are made by Magic Leap, a US company whose backers include Google and AT&T.
With Orion, Meta has achieved a field of view of 70° in a much smaller product, which is a grand innovation and crucial for Zuckerberg’s vision of an unobtrusive wearable device.
The neural interface wristband is also vital. It listens to nerve impulses from the brain to the hand, allowing users to control the device using subtle finger gestures such as pinching and swiping thumb against index finger. Newer mixed reality headsets such as Apple Vision Pro are controlled similarly, but rely on external cameras to interpret hand movements.
An advantage of tapping into nerve impulses directly is that gestures do not require line of sight, and eventually might not even require the person to perform the full gesture – only to think about it. The technology also opens up brand new input methods, such as texting via mimicking handwriting, and is likely to mature before consumer-grade holographic displays become available.
Has Orion been more trouble than Meta expected?
Meta initially gave the Orion prototype only a 10% chance of success, so it has exceeded expectations. While there is still much work to be done, particularly in reducing costs and miniaturising components, Orion could eventually lead to a consumer-ready device.
Do you think Meta will get an affordable version launched by 2027?
Meta thinks the initial price will be comparable to flagship phones or laptops the new iPhone 16 starts at £799. We might see development kits released towards the end of the decade, aimed at early adopters and developers, much like how VR headsets were introduced a decade ago.
In the meantime, other AR glasses and mixed reality headsets such as Meta Quest 3 and Apple Vision Pro serve as platforms for developing applications that could eventually run on AR glasses.
Why are the Orion glasses still so expensive?
Holographic AR glasses remain expensive because much of the hardware – including Ledos micro-display panels and silicon carbide waveguides (which are used to optimise light transmission) – isn’t yet produced at scale. These components are critical for achieving high resolution and holographic displays – and production constraints are reportedly pushing Orion unit prices close to US$10,000. Even then, battery life is currently limited to around two hours.
Could anyone potentially beat Meta to market?
Thanks to Meta’s multi-billion dollar investment in R&D through its Reality Labs subsidiary, it has become a leader in virtual and mixed reality headsets, with a robust app ecosystem. However, Apple, Microsoft, Samsung and Google are developing similar technologies.
Microsoft’s HoloLens and [Snapchat owner] Snap Inc’s Spectacles series have made strides in AR, but responses have been mixed due to limitations such as narrow fields of view and lower graphics quality. Orion appears to be ahead in holographic display technology. Another company to particularly watch is Apple, which is refining Vision Pro and also exploring AR smart glasses.
Will AR glasses change the world?
AR glasses could ignite a transformative “iPhone moment” that redefines how we interact with technology. Zuckerberg envisions them as the next major computing platform, offering a more natural and intuitive alternative to smartphones.
The success of early mass-market smart glasses such as Meta’s Ray-Ban glasses, which allow users to make calls, capture videos and interact with Meta AI, hints that AR glasses could see widespread adoption.
Zuckerberg initially believed holographic technology would be necessary for smart glasses to offer functionality beyond the basic features of these Ray-Bans. But being able to incorporate an AI voice-powered assistant has made Meta realise that smart glasses can be developed from the ground up as a new consumer product category. While the four-hour battery life requires improvement, the positive feedback from both reviewers and users, particularly using them on Instagram and TikTok, demonstrates the potential.
What does the future look like?
Reading messages, watching a virtual screen on the wall, playing games, collaborative work – all the things you can do with mixed-reality headsets, but shrunk down to a pair of glasses. Friends will teleport into your living room, a video call where both people feel present in the same space.
It gets even stranger when you incorporate AI: virtual assistants can already see what you see, hear what you hear, talk to you, answer questions and follow commands using smart glasses. In future, AI will be able to manifest itself in your vision, and you’ll be able to have natural conversations with it.
By 2030, AI will radically change the ways in which we interact with each other, our physical world and computers. Orion aims to prepare us for a world in which the physical, artificial and virtual co-exist.
Ever feel like flipping a table and walking out of a meeting? Well, YouTuber ReelAesthetic has done the next best thing—compiling a glorious supercut of the most epic table flip scenes in movie history! Warning: May inspire sudden urges to overturn furniture. Viewer discretion is advised.
List of movies in order of appearance:
00:09 Magnolia (1999)
00:12 Angels In the Outfield (1994)
00:14 Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure (1989)
00:16 Pulp Fiction (1994)
00:18 Die Hard (1988)
00:22 Citizen Kane (1941)
00:24 The Artist (2011)
00:27 I Heart Huckabees (2004)
00:34 Raging Bull (1980)
00:39 Red Lights (2012)
00:42 Once Upon A Time In Mexico (2003)
00:46 Moneyball (2011)
00:48 Being John Malkovich (1999)
00:49 Splice (2009)
00:51 Greta (2018)
00:53 The Jesus Film (1979)
00:56 Fantastic Mr. Fox (2009)
00:58 Happily Ever After (Jigyaku no uta) (2007)
01:03 Jesus Christ Superstar (1973)
01:06 Thor (2011)
01:10 Jesus (1999)
01:14 Moonstruck (1987)
01:20 Scum (1979)
01:26 Titanic (1997)
01:28 The Gospel Of John (2003)
01:29 Jesus Of Montreal (1989)
01:30 Zandalee (1991)
01:31 Pollock (2000)
01:34 Son Of Frankenstein (1939)
01:36 The Greatest Story Ever Told (1965)
01:38 Dick Tracy (1990)
01:40 A Clockwork Orange (1971)
01:41 Daredevil (2003)
01:42 Being John Malkovich (1999)
01:44 Take Shelter (2011)
For today’s edition of “Deal of the Day,” here are some of the best deals we stumbled on while browsing the web this morning! Please note that Geeks are Sexy might get a small commission from qualifying purchases done through our posts. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
–1minAI: Lifetime Subscription – Why choose between ChatGPT, Midjourney, GoogleAI, and MetaAI when you could get them all in one tool? – $234.00 $39.99